I´ve tried unpack() but It don´t work, but very posible because me.. Could someone do a little example using unpack for read the mpr?

Aja, ok thx, I will try and I´ll post again here with the results.

Thx u again

Nono, verás, cada uno es responsable de lo suyo. Yo no subiría una hotlap con trucos pero bueno..


De todos modos, yo creo que deberían arreglar esto, ya que no es bueno para nadie.

Y lo peor, que hay una página web donde está el programita este, y para descargarlo hay quedarle cosa de 4 € al propietario, por lo que está ganando un dinero a costa de destrozar un juego tan grande como lfs.

Insisto, veo muy mal que haga eso, que no pretendo justificarlo ni mucho menos, pero que creo que lfs debe solventar estos fallos, por que si no, mal vamos.


Saludos

A thing, Nobody have think that this can be a way of protest to devs for don´t fix the fail?

Already I can open the replay file, with fopen, with I don´t know how do it by bites :S

To do this, you can use calculator..

If the average lap is 1:33, put it in seconds, 93 secs.

40 mins into secs ==> 2400 secs

2400 / 93 ==> +- 25 laps..

That we everyone do to set laps based in time.. Isn´t exactly but near than it..

Hi

I´m going to try do a php script which can read all the data from mpr.

WeatherWind, LapsPlayerFast Lap, End places, etc..

And I would get a bit help for this..

**Note, I know that would be more easy in C but must be in php..**

Thx

Due to that "?" generated by LFSPoints, the aplication which read the xml don´t know who´s ESPA?A[XTM] because that "?" do that ESPAÑA[XTM] is one racer, and ESPA?A[XTM] other.

Thx

Error in latins characters like as "ñ" "ó" "í" and the "tm" etc.

Would be fantastic to solve this error..

Here the xml..

PS. Fantastic app

I want tell just two thing..

In real life, If you touch lateraly your car with a wall, you car won´t do a 360º Flip. So Just drive on so2r in uf1 or fxo and you will see that Enormous BUG...

The second, it´s clear that we knowing that this bug exists, ( yes, it exists, because someone can see that "No, It doesn´t" ? ), all the LFS drivers would think to drive more carefully, but, so in this way, this isn´t a realist game..


I think that nobody must see The flag in the nick, but yes the opinions... +1 isn´t a opinion, this is a post, not a poll, so I resquest plz, that no one more put the stupid +1 because it donesn´t mean nothing..

So I agree with solve this bug, but i agree too with solve another bugs, because, we know that this isn´t the only one bug in LFS, but It´s, with lag crashes, the most important bug because it affect to the driving.

We ( LFS WORLD DRIVERS ) want a real drive, we are here for a driving simulator, ifelse, we would be in NFS, where you can paint your car, put spinners and other stuppid stuff.

PS. " Toma ladrillo"

PS2. Don´t speculate with this is a attack from spain drivers and other stupid sutff, We (everyone in this forum) aren´t boys, or almost, everyone try think as a serious person, so don´t desvituate the post with "Spanish attack" "Inquisition" or other stuff.

Thx for read this

Quote from (SaM) :

Bienvenida a esta comunidad!

Eso eso, Bienvenida

Conexion List I think that it´s for how many people is in server.. If you configure a server, with maxguest you can set the number of guest (conexions) that can join in the host. so if you put 23, 23 people will can join, and never will be 22 because host use one.. I think..

It´s happends too with wr on so1r-mrt..

+1, but without minimun of reason..

Hi

I´ve seen one thing that I think that is a Little bug. In conexion list, if there are five people on the server, you see 6 conexion ( I think that host is counting as conexion but it´s not logical..) , thing that isn´t true, because it would show 5.

Quote from geeman1 :

We already have a ability to send a setup to another racer online.

The suggestion it´s not to send setup to another racer, it´s that the another racer get your set without your intervention.

Example:

You and me, are in the same team. You´re driving and doing wonderful times, but I need your setup to improve, because your set it´s better, so i just push one boton and I get your set, without you do anything.

Do you understand it now?

Try Do wr in bl1 - xfg with set default :P ..[/offtopic]


And About the suggestion?

Hi

I would know what racers this about this suggest and If would be posible for next version ( I think that´s it´s imposible for Version X, so the next ).

As everybody know, the set, is the 50 % of a good lap time. So, we always like get the best set, usually for leagues, and other races.

The normal leagues, are formed by diferents team, and the team works hard to do a good set. Normaly, when you are trying to do a good lap, or improve the set, you can´t send that set to your team, so for this, I will propose a system based in get a set, without the driver send you ( wait , don´t say yet that in this way everybody could "steal" the sets.. )

In that system, the racer A would be driving, and the B would push a button ( example in conexion list ) and automaticly he get that set.

That´s clear that this system, must have a security system, as could be a option that would say:

Who can get your set? Nobody. FriendList (based in s2 names, never nicks.) and the last option ALL.

So in this way, you always keep the control about who could get your set.

What do you think?

One question..

Is about the new ban/kick system. If the player that is being voted for get kick or ban, leave server, whats happend?

The actualy Test Patch is W26 reased today..

One question, I get the xml file, but now, How I can do to get a html readable?

Quote from FL!P :

OK, then what happens when your connection with the server is restored and there's another car just where you appear again?

Yes, for this reason, lfs would check before do appear you car, if you have a car near than you, if you have a car near, you don´t appear until you get a security distance.. and in this way, wouldn´t have anyproblmes, no disconections and no two flying cars.. I think that isn´t a bad idea, no?

Actualy, If u lost conexion with server, Ping Out!!! so no option to the server try conect again with u.. I think that I haven´t explain me ok..


Example.

You are driving, you suddenly lost conexion, all your conexion, (in normal case the bars start crewing and you Get ping out ), you lost all the conexion with server, but you can driver yet, because your lfs is trying to reconect with server lfs, after that, your lfs reconect to this lfs server, the time splits that you do, are sent by your lfs to the lfs server, and you can drive as if nothing had happnened, so you never will get ping time out.
You only would give it, it the server it´s who Turn off...


It´s more clear?

And repit, why your lfs can´t send the parcials that you done when your server was reconecting? This server reconect isn´t the actual concept of reconect, actual, you must click blah blah, In this way, you don´t know nothing about your disconect, so the disconects would be a thing as the actual lag just...

It´s hard to explain and more in non spanish :P

I think that a way of solve the ping out problem is for the devs. that If one driver lose conexion, the driver can drive as nothing happend and the host, would try to reconect with this driver.

So if the host can´t reconect to that driver in, we can say.. 25 secs as much, the server ping out him, if can connect, the driver appear as normal in track, but checking previously if he don´t give a car in the same position, or in less diference of time that 0,xx secs o other...


I think that this would be fantastic, because can reduce a lot of ping outs, and would get more realism to lfs, because in the real life, nobody gets ping out :P

PS1. And in this way, I would take off the bars that increas when one driver lost conexion, because that only have two options, coneted or disconected, so, the trying conect to that driver would be invisible for the drivers...

PS2. Sorry for my bad inglish..

Last edited by ESPAÑA[XTM], Wed 16 May 2007, 16:51.

If you like a server to play online with others, you must set usermaster=yes and ip=auto.

Quote from russraine :

Ian H, you stupid dick!
If I did happen to create a freeware app, I would actually release the source code if I were stopping development, as a program without someone to develop it is useless, what sort of legacy is that.

Hell why don't the LFS coders do the same, stop development and leave us with a unfinished game to play, everyone, Ian H is saying that would be a good thing for them to do, what a wanker! I wish I had a time machine so that I could go back in time and drown you in some Scottish lake.

Really .

i think as russraine, if I won´t to continue developing that, why don´t get the source code to other ppl for they can develop it?